THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES

New Publication
Homeopathy in Intensive Care
and Emergency Medicine
Homeopathy First Magazine
Best Vitamin C Drink 
Learn More With Caralyn 
Coupon SHOPWITHHWC

 

Homeopathy World Community

Creating Waves of Awareness

Report: 1st Ever Research Paper on Homeopathic Medicine of Ph.D Level


I never protected homeopathy with baseless evidence. I am the supporter of homeopathy with true and scientific knowledge. What I have observed that (with all excuses) Homeopaths have many blunder stories of cured cases but very few maintains documentary proofs for their cliam.

What I was seeing that all organizations, institutions and departments are raising fingers on homeopathy that it is all placebo, fraud and this and that. It has no research work but what I myself observed, seen and gathered practically from my fellow homeopaths was that of lot of successful cued cases I was confused what’s true? Homeopaths are wrong or what world-renowned institutions / organizations are saying is correct?

I talked to so many homeopaths in Pakistan to start research work on homeopathic medicines under the supervision of those institutions which are recognized which are acceptable to everyone and which have reputation at world wide and find out what’s the mystery involve (if any) in homeopathic medicines, whether it does work or not??? So that we should know what is true? Truth should be come out or I should leave homeopathy and do not waste my time further in this profession.

First step I took was that, I got admission and got all world recognized homeopathic recognized degrees to upgrade my knowledge then prepared a team who were in favour to carry out research work in homeopathy rather to waste time on internet on various web discussion forum and try to convince others with funny stories without evidence.

You will observe that I never unrealistically protected homeopathy because my opinion is that there is a limitation of each pathy & therapy and if we claim so high about something then we should also prove our argument practically and not through philosophical thoughts. I expect people will not support my opinion but I do not spare anyone if you try to convince others by just elaborating your philosophical thought that has no worth or reality on ground when your own qualification is less then that of a clerk.

My group contacted to University of Agriculture Faisalabad, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences and NARC etc to conduct trials on homeopathic medicines without involving ourselves at any stage so that people may not object on the status and credibility of the research studies carried out.

It is the first ever Ph.D carried out on “Pure Homeopathic Medicine” in world recognized, ACCREDIATED and Charted University that is also affiliated to and acceptable by Higher Education Commission (HEC) in Pakistan. The supervisors were also Ph.D qualified and were on the panel of Govt recognized offices. The Researcher Dr. Muhammad Faiz Qamar also did comparative study with other allopathic and herbal products for the same disease found that HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINE IN EFFICACY IS NEAR TO ALLOPAHTIC MEDICINE IN HEAMONCHOSIS DISEASE IN GOAT AND SHEEP.

I played no rule; this all credit goes to Dr. Muhammad Faiz Qamar who contributed marvelous job and served homeopathy with his efforts. Did great job. 2nd credit goes to group of homeopaths who initiated the idea, provided services and contributed mentally, physically and morally.

Few Scanned docs are pasted here for your perusal. For detail study contact to university and procure complete thesis.

Views: 771

Comment

You need to be a member of Homeopathy World Community to add comments!

Join Homeopathy World Community

Comment by Dr. MAS on June 29, 2010 at 12:47am
Para wise comments are appended below:-

[Quote=Bahi] Kindly go through the following:( Please refer Dr. George Vithoulkas)
Most of the papers published on homeopathic trials till today are confused and confusing.

Dr. MAS That’s why a research project is completed at Ph.D level, this time confusion is removed. You should be happy now. J

[Quote=Bahi] In homeopathy, there is no such thing as giving a remedy for a specific ailment or disease. The idea of double blind research is valid for conventional medicine but not for homeopathy which is based on the principle of giving a remedy for a totality of symptoms of an individual and not only for his single ailment, disease or pathology.

Dr. MAS Then you should come forward with some protocol that can test homeopathy. Do you want to say, there is no such protocol in this world that can check homeopathic medicines effectiveness?


[Quote=Bahi] If such papers continue to be published then the real homeopathic community, the practitioners who apply homeopathy in everyday practice will never accept this type of research.

Dr. MAS It is you, who is not accepting ;) otherwise world of community has already accepted who has picked up what’s have been done and what’s have been attained?

[Quote=Bahi] Homeopathic community should not accept research that does not comply and does not respect the homeopathic principles.

Dr. MAS Why you should not come with solution also? It is so easy to say, I will not accept, it is wrong and this and that…. Come with solution? How you will prove Homeopathic Medicine efficacy? How you will differentiate between placebo and homeopathic remedy aconite cm?


Which are these principles:

[Quote=Bahi] 1. That homeopathy does not treat diseases, but only diseased individuals. Therefore every case may need a different remedy though suffering with the same pathology. This rule was violated by almost all trials in all the meta-analysis, even in those trials that were coined as classical. An exception was the trials that attempted to be closer to the idea of the homeopathic principles as well. P. Fisher et al 14 Jacobs et al 15 and Schwab 16. These trials showed excellent results in spite of the fact they did not follow a process of complete individualization of the cases.

Dr. MAS The common sense approach is, homeopathy does not treat the disease but if somebody comes with a trial and says, he has treated a disease with homeopathic medicine under control study then what you will say, No homeopathy cannot treat the disease? (Big Laugh) :D Or That disease was not cured with homeopathic medicine? Are you denying, that a homeopathic medicine cannot treat a disease? It’s a common sense approach that you should be happy that homeopathic medicines can even treat a disease just like Hahnemann treated disease like “Scarlet Fever” with belladonna. He got result in 3 out five treated. Hahnemann won popularity for the first time then. Go and study history of homeopathy. Homeopathic Medicines have also results in treating diseases, is it a positive outcome or negative? ;) (Smile)


[Quote=Bahi] 2. There is usually an initial aggravation after the first prescription, especially in chronic cases that should be considered as a positive sign. That factor has been totally ignored.

Dr. MAS I again repeat you have not followed the entire study, it was not a study to verify “homeopathic principle of aggravation” rather a trial is conducted on an acute condition in animals treated with homeopathic medicines.


[Quote=Bahi] In a recent study published in Cephalalgia 17 the aggravation period was evaluated as a negative sign and the homeopathic group was pronounced worse than the placebo. Cephalalgia refused to publish my objections to the study. 18

Dr. MAS It was not the theme of study of Ph.D

[Quote=Bahi] 3. In severe chronic conditions the homeopath may need to prescribe a second or a third remedy before any sign of improvement is apparent. Such prescription should take place only after evaluating the results by the previous remedy. This rule has also been ignored in all studies.

Dr. MAS It was not a study to confirm “the importance of 2nd prescription” ;) For that purpose a separate protocol can be defined. Come with some protocol also.

[Quote=Bahi] 4. Research should take in to consideration the length of time and the severity of the case. The prognosis of a chronic condition (the possible time after which an amelioration sets in through homeopathic treatment) differs according to the length of time the disease is active and the severity of the case.

Dr. MAS A very simple trial was conducted, parasite was found before treatment and after homeopathic treatment it was not found. That was the simple trial conducted by adopting different techniques of research work to prove the efficacy of homeopathic remedies in above 30c potencies. Then comparison was done with other system of medicines like herbal and allopathy.

[Quote=Bahi] Further there is a big difference between giving complementary medicines, sighted in your remarks and mixing all the medicines and then giving this formulation a name, Trematox homeopathic inj. A medicine can't become homeopathic, simply, by manufacturer labeling it as Homeopathic medicines.
Kindly refer ECH definition of homeopathic drug proving:
Reference: Homeopathic Drug Proving – Definition

Dr. MAS The research study was not conducted by me, The researcher also compared the efficacy of homeopathic, allopathic and herbal medicines on a specific ailment also. What he did wrong? Was it a positive approach or negative? I again repeat it was not a drug-proving test. It was a test to check the efficacy of already proved homeopathic medicine in potency form under scientific controlled method.
Comment by DR. Sushil Bahl on June 28, 2010 at 8:05am
Kindly go through the following:( Please refer Dr. George Vithoulkas)
Most of the papers published on homeopathic trials till today are confused and confusing. In homeopathy, there is no such thing as giving a remedy for a specific ailment or disease. The idea of double blind research is valid for conventional medicine but not for homeopathy which is based on the principle of giving a remedy for a totality of symptoms of an individual and not only for his single ailment, disease or pathology. If such papers continue to be published then the real homeopathic community, the practitioners who apply homeopathy in everyday practice will never accept this type of research.

Homeopathic community should not accept research that does not comply and does not respect the homeopathic principles.

Which are these principles:

1. That homeopathy does not treat diseases, but only diseased individuals. Therefore every case may need a different remedy though suffering with the same pathology. This rule was violated by almost all trials in all the meta-analysis, even in those trials that were coined as classical. An exception was the trials that attempted to be closer to the idea of the homeopathic principles as well. P. Fisher et al 14 Jacobs et al 15 and Schwab 16. These trials showed excellent results in spite of the fact they did not follow a process of complete individualization of the cases.
2. There is usually an initial aggravation after the first prescription, especially in chronic cases that should be considered as a positive sign. That factor has been totally ignored. Also that sufficient time should be given in the design of the trial, in order to overcome the aggravation period.
In a recent study published in Cephalalgia 17 the aggravation period was evaluated as a negative sign and the homeopathic group was pronounced worse than the placebo. Cephalalgia refused to publish my objections to the study. 18
3. In severe chronic conditions the homeopath may need to prescribe a second or a third remedy before any sign of improvement is apparent. Such prescription should take place only after evaluating the results by the previous remedy. This rule has also been ignored in all studies.
4. Research should take in to consideration the length of time and the severity of the case. The prognosis of a chronic condition (the possible time after which an amelioration sets in through homeopathic treatment) differs according to the length of time the disease is active and the severity of the case.
REF 18: Vithoulkas G. Unpublished Critical Review of Class. Hom. Treatm. of Chronic Headaches in Cephalagia Oct 1997 sent to Cephalalgia and their respond.
REF17:Walach H, W. Haeusler T Lowes, D Mussbach, U Schamell, W Springer et al Classical Hom. Treatm. of Chronic Headaches Cephalalgia 1997;17: 119-26

Further there is a big difference between giving complementary medicines, sighted in your remarks and mixing all the medicines and then giving this formulation a name, Trematox homeopathic inj.A medicine can't become homeopathic, simply, by manufacturer labeling it as Homeopathic medicines.
Kindly refer ECH definition of homeopathic drug proving:
Reference: Homeopathic Drug Proving – Definition
A homeopathic drug proving (HDP) is done by the defined administration of a proving substance in a nontoxic
dilution, prepared according to a homeopathic pharmacopoeia, to healthy persons (volunteers,
provers).
The proving substance causes reversible symptoms on the physical, mental and psychic level of
volunteers, which are systematically observed and recorded by the volunteer(s) and the investigator(s).
This is done in order to use it as a homeopathic remedy according to the principle of similarity in a sick person.

Reference
Comment by Dr. MAS on June 27, 2010 at 11:06pm
Quoted from above:

More over the credential are earned for :

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PARASITOLOGY and not Homeopathy.

Response:

Again, I guess, Research work is not your field that is why you are raising the most basic question.

When somebody complete Ph.D in the filed of chemistry, he or she is supposed to be called Ph.D in chemistry.

Dr. Faiz did research work in the field of Parasitology, further on “Heamonchosis”. He treated Heamonchosis with homeopathic medicines under control study. What’s wrong here? I am surprised with your remarks. (smile)

My colleague, extracted a steriod after doing research work on "MODESTA" plant and was awarded Ph.D Chemistry not Ph.D on Modesta.
Comment by Dr. MAS on June 27, 2010 at 10:30pm
Cina and others are written in every day materia medica.

If you are again asking where the proving of Trematox is conducted. Then I doubt, might be you have no idea of what is research work, what is protocol and how it is defined and executed?

If you can able to guide me and If you can design a protocol to carry out research work to check the efficacy of homeopathic medicine then please let me know, I would be much obliged. Because I am in homeopathic field for the last 22 years and yet I have not found a single one.

What do you mean by mixopathy?

Do you mean we cannot administer Ferrum Phos 30 and Kali mur 30 as combination in acute fever to patients?

Do you mean we cannot prescribe Nux 30 at night and Sulphur 30 empty stomach in the morning in piles case?

Do you mean, we cannot prescribe LASIX injection (An Allopahtic diuretic medicine) and apis melif 30c (Homeopathic Medicine) in CRF patient?

What exactly mixopathy is?

Who told you injection is not an approved method to administer dose in patients? I think, you have never worked in hospitals in emergency ward. Where patients are brought unconscious and sometime injection is used. In Animals, you can’t rinse the mouth. You can use injection, it is not odd thing. Injection is not medicine but a way of administrating the medicine. There are many other methods which you can use to administer homeo medicines like dragees through anus.
Comment by DR. Sushil Bahl on June 4, 2010 at 6:46am
Which Materia Medica contains reference to this medicine.
If any BODY conducted the proving of TREMATOX?
Mixopathy is no Homeopathy.
Injection is not an approved vehicle of drug administration in Homeopathic medicines.

More over the credential are earned for :

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PARASITOLOGY and not Homeopathy.
Comment by Dr. MAS on June 4, 2010 at 12:27am
Dear Sushil,

If an animal is showing……

The animal is rubbing his snout on ground or with plant stem
The animal Lethargic condition highly noticeable
The Animal is showing slow response and Weak
The animal is grinding his Teeth and some time Gnawing
It is noticed that the animal is loosing weight and emaciated
Eyes are sunken and paleness on mucous membranes.
Bottle jaw
Diarrhea constipation alternate with stomach disordered

Other noted investigations / complaints are
Anaemia
Low erythrocytes
Hypoproteinaemia
Iron level is decreased
Larvae present

And on that symptoms if homeopathic remedies (may be cina or sabad in above 30 potency) was administered through injection then which homeopathic principle or aphorism is deviated here?
Comment by DR. Sushil Bahl on June 3, 2010 at 2:26pm
Dear Doctor,I do have proper regards for the University as well you.But what I fail to understand, is, as to which principle of Homeopathy has been applied.Please let me know which aphorism of Organon supports it.
Comment by Dr. MAS on June 2, 2010 at 11:59pm
Dear Suhas

Your listed studies are clinical trials and not Ph.D level studies,. There are one thousand or above such studies available but that is not my claim. Read my claim first which you missed entirely. So I have no hard feeling ;)

None of the studies you listed deserved or claimed afterwards to be awarded Ph.D Degree to whom who conducted the studies. That is my claim. You read my title, opening post, pasted documents and subsequent posts. I have not claimed that no trial studies are conducted on homeopathic medicines before Dr. Muhammad Faiz Qamar research paper. I claimed something else that I am going to list here again.

The person was awarded an accredited Ph.D degree on conducting research work on homeopathic medicines with the following distinction.

A. THIS IS THE FIRST EVER PH.D LEVEL STUDY CARRIED OUT

B. PURE HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINES

C. THE UNIVERSITY WHERE IT WAS CARRIED OUT IS ACCREDIATED AND ENJOY HIGH STATUS AT WORLD LEVEL.

D. THE SUPERVISORS ARE ON THE PANEL WHO ARE OFFICIALLY AUTHORIZED TO CARRYOUT SUPERVISION

E. UNIVERSITY IS AFFILIATED WITH HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION (HEC) IN PAKISTAN THAT IS THE LAST AUTHORITY IN PAKISTAN UNDER WHICH ALL CHARTERED UNVIVERSITIES ARE RUNNING (in simple words government of a country also accept it)

F. THE RESEARCHER WAS AWARDED THIS DEGREE ON CARRYING OUT THIS RESEARCH WORK. . (It is more important then anything else)



I am astonished to read that you are supporting that study to whom you have no idea because following words are written “NO PUBLICATIONS PROVIDED” then how did you exactly know what type of study it was?

You please kindly link, only ONE, Yes only one specific study that in your sense fulfils that criteria. Thank you so that I withdraw my claim. I love to study the details :)
Comment by Suhas Kotbagi on June 2, 2010 at 9:21am
Dear Dr.Mas,

I do not agree with your claim, the most I can agree is that may be this is the first PhD level research in veterinary homeopathy in PAKISTAN.

Please see the following URL:

http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=homeopathy

There are total 38 homeopathy research which are either on going or completed or terminated. You can see that none of these are from correspondence or online universities. Then NIH would not put on their web site.

Just to give a glimpse: out of 38 research (and there may be many more, which I am not aware of)
1. 10 are conducted at Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (Ministry of Health).
2. 3 are conducted at Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
3. 2 are conducted at University of Sao Paolo, Brazil.
4. 2 at Charitie University, Berlin, Germany.
5. 2 at University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
6.1 at Federal University of Sao Paolo, Brazil.
7. 2 at Pascoe Pharmazeutische Praeparate, GMBH, Germany.
8. 3 at University of Washington.
9. 1 each at
: (SCNM), (Sunnybrook health sciences center, Canada),( univ. of Wisconsin, Madison),( 1 in India), (2 by boiron),( Univ of Missouri),( univ. of erlangen-nurnberg, Germany), (univ of Oklahoma), (malamed: Sierra Leone), ( NCCAM NIH: USA), (Univ of Heidelberg, Germany), (IAA, NIH, USA).

you can go over the link, there it is in more detail.

Another point that you always come up about those who have studied through correspondence etc, that is typical of sub-continental mind set. for your information BHMS is not recognized by any country out side of Indian sub-continent, especially here in USA a DIHom from British institute is recognized by Council on Homeopathic Education and has more value than BHMS of Indian Sub-continent. Does that mean we Indian BHMS degree holders are not qualified enough? No

It is just that WE FEAR what WE do not know. It is not how much you are qualified or have degree from recognized universities, finally it comes down to how you can apply that knowledge for betterment of humanity. So STOP degrading others and their out look.

you make it seem like this combination of trematox is highly secret formula, the homeopathic pharmacy which sell this in pakistan (of which url was sent in my earlier post) clearly says: and I copy paste here:

TREMATOX
ANTI ENDO PARASITIC / LIVER FLUKE
Effective Injectable Treatment Against All Types Of Worms & Liver Fluke

Mode of Action: Its indications are in particular to protect the animal against symptoms of this internal parasitic and liver fluke complaint and to improve the constitution. In this way a long lasting cure from helminthes is possible and relapses are prevented. The medicine stimultes and strengthens the vital force (defence mechanism) of the body. It is a symptomatic treatment. Hence, the medicine effectively controls all the symptoms produced by the disease. It has no expiry, no harmful / side effects.

Ingredients: Cina D50, Liver Fluke Nosode D50, Filix Mas D50 Dl D. Water

Directions:
Do not feed anything two hours before and after medication.
No need to refrigerate and do not place in front of TV.

Dosage:
5ml per animal L/M or LV twice a year. (END OF copy paste)

Hope this information will suffice to your claim. No hard feelings...:)

SK
Comment by Dr. MAS on June 2, 2010 at 4:40am
The university is affiliated with Govt Recognized HEC

http://www.hec.gov.pk/OurInstitutes/Pages/Default.aspx

See Punjab List. It is on number four.

GET ➤ 
Cancer and Homeopathy
Best Vitamin C Drink
Enter SHOPWITHHWC
for $3 coupon

AGRO HOMEOPATHY

RADIO & VIDEO SHOWS

© 2019   Created by Debby Bruck.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...