THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES

New Publication
Homeopathy in Intensive Care
and Emergency Medicine
Homeopathy First Magazine
Best Vitamin C Drink 
Learn More With Caralyn 
Coupon SHOPWITHHWC

 

Homeopathy World Community

Creating Waves of Awareness

Pratik Kanjilal (Pratik Kanjilal is publisher of The Little Magazine, The views expressed by the author are personal)
Email Author pratik@littlemag.com
May 29, 2010

Published in Prestigious Indian News Daily Hindustan Times in its Editorial.

I urge more & more Homeopaths to write to Mr.Pratik for his bold writing.

At its annual conference next Wednesday, the British Medical Association (BMA) could decide to lobby for homoeopathy to be banned from the UK National Health Service. The validity of the system has always been contested, and I am not naïve enough to take a position for or against the motion in a complicated debate in science and medicine — which are not the same thing, by the way. But I am disturbed by the intemperate dogmatism of the BMA, which has denounced homoeopathy as ‘witchcraft’. I wonder if it’s on a witch-hunt, a related activity which is just as benighted. Its vehemence suggests that the issue is not medical science but medical politics.

It’s an important distinction because the BMA is a reputed organisation and any campaign it takes up would influence opinion worldwide. But with respect to the question of homoeopathy, and with all due respect to the BMA, we should remember that contrary to the popular impression, it is not a scientific organisation. It is a trade union for doctors. That’s the first caveat.

The second: homoeopathy is routinely denounced because no one knows how it works. But a physician should be asking a simpler question: does it work for my patient? The doctor’s primary concern is to offer a cure, or at least comfort. Ruminations about its scientific basis come later. Many patients turn to alternative schools when mainstream medicine fails and leaves them facing chronic disability and pain, or the inscrutable mystery of death. Unless homoeopathy is unequivocally proven to be quackery, which is not the case, it is irresponsible of doctors to bar access to it. It smacks of scientific fundamentalism.

The third caveat: homoeopathy’s benefits are unproven because they can’t be tested by the method of science. Even the most diligently designed double-blind experiment must fail on one significant count. Science requires a valid experiment to be replicable. If Aconite 30 cures the sinusitis of Andy West of Tintagel, it must identically cure Judy North of Inverness. However, homoeopaths go by clusters of symptoms rather than the names of diseases. And, rejecting the egalitarianism of mainstream medicine, they believe that Andy and Judy are different people and should be treated differently. How do you design an experiment to accommodate that difference?

Homoeopathy is based on Hahnemann’s principle of ‘like curing like’. But in operation it is symptomatically statistical. It uses statistical shorthand like ‘miasm’ and ‘psora’ to cluster people and their symptoms into groups, which are mapped to cures. If one banned it, one should also consider banning other disciplines founded on statistics. Economics, a notoriously erratic discipline, immediately comes to mind. Should one ban economics? Maybe.

Maybe — it’s a power word for our times, when science has begun to question its dogmatisms. For instance, the thinking of Sir Martin Rees, astronomer royal of the UK and president of the Royal Society, raises questions reminiscent of intelligent design and The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. In comparison to his free thought, witch-hunts against unexplained phenomena like homoeopathy look positively medieval. I look forward to the day when a healthy agnosticism replaces our scientific fundamentalisms. And by the way, did I mention that Queen Elizabeth II has a personal homoeopath? Maybe I forgot. Yeah, maybe. I love that word.

Pratik Kanjilal is publisher of The Little Magazine, The views expressed by the author are personalAt its annual conference next Wednesday, the British Medical Association (BMA) could decide to lobby for homoeopathy to be banned from the UK National Health Service. The validity of the system has always been contested, and I am not naïve enough to take a position for or against the motion in a complicated debate in science and medicine — which are not the same thing, by the way. But I am disturbed by the intemperate dogmatism of the BMA, which has denounced homoeopathy as ‘witchcraft’. I wonder if it’s on a witch-hunt, a related activity which is just as benighted. Its vehemence suggests that the issue is not medical science but medical politics.

Views: 36

Comment by Dr Muhammed Rafeeque on May 29, 2010 at 8:35am
Thanks for the information.

It is not because of medical politics, but medical money-tricks! British Medical Association is a reputed organization, but their members are spoiling its credibility by speaking for the money they received from the multinational drug business lobby. I wonder why these multinational drug companies are against homeopathy? If homeopathy is posing financial loss to them, they also can involve in homeopathic drug manufacturing. In India, recently two famous modern drug manufactures have started their own homeopathic drug manufacturing units. It is better than playing politics and money-tricks!
Comment by Debby Bruck on May 29, 2010 at 11:03pm
Is there some action that should be taken this week before Wednesday?
Comment by Dr. Nisanth Nambison MD on May 30, 2010 at 12:57am
Yes, we should all in one voice. Dare them to stop Homeopathy, since the patronage of patients is more important than what allopaths think.

Comment

You need to be a member of Homeopathy World Community to add comments!

Join Homeopathy World Community

Search This Site

GET ➤ 
Cancer and Homeopathy
Best Vitamin C Drink
Enter SHOPWITHHWC
for $3 coupon

AGRO HOMEOPATHY

RADIO & VIDEO SHOWS

© 2017   Created by Debby Bruck.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...