Creating Waves of Awareness
There are many schools of practice in homoeopathy. Dr. Hahnemann created this system on a firm principle 'similia similibus currentur' known as 'law of similia' . He also put forward seven such cardinal principles in homoeopathy like the law of simplex, the law of minimum dose, the doctrine of vital force, the doctrine of drug dynamisation, the doctrine of individualisation, the doctrine of chronic disease and the doctrine of drug proving. According to our master the highest ideal of cure is rapid, gentle and permanent restoration of the health, or removal and annihilation of the disease in its whole extent, in the shortest, most reliable, and most harmless way, on easily comprehensible principles.
But now a days there are many homoeopathic practitioners who are practicing differently in their own way. Each one is creating his own principles with out considering the principles of homoeopathy. Is it the right way? But the actual problem is more interesting and it is a big joke. Majority of these doctors are getting the so called 'results' or giving some relief to the patient. But actually by these 'unhahnemannian' method, physicians are satisfied, but the homoeopathic system suffers. The doctors are possessing new cars and new houses and are giving better education for their children; but homoeopathy as a whole is declining in its quality.
We all are now aware of the suppression theory put forward by Dr Prafull Vijayakar. Here we can see that homoeopathy, the system without any side effect, can also suppress. Are the 'amazing cures' made by these unhahnamannian methods actual suppressions? We fill our pockets with money from patients and pharmaceutical companies and send the disease problem of the patient to a deeper level where it is more difficult to cure. Suppose we are treating the eczema of a patient. After completely 'removing' it, if we are giving the patient asthma or diabetes, is it a homoeopathic cure? If we are treating like this, then what is the difference between homoeopathy and other systems of medicine?
Homoeopathic educational system should also be corrected. We all have heard after starting the private practice that the theory and practice in homoeopathy are entirely different. What is the reason behind it? Homoeopathy is the true scientific medical system and the practical application of this system should be based strictly on its theories. Failure to do this is not the failure of the system, but it is due to the failure of the followers of homoeopathy.
We are attending various continuing homoeopathic medical education programs in many places by different doctors. But many of them are putting their own theories during their teaching hours. After hearing all the so called 'amazing cures', youngsters are in utter confusion. They believe that this is the right way. But after attending another C H M E program, totally different from the previous one, they will certainly fall into a pool of confusion. After applying these amazing methods of cure in their consulting room, they may face failures and will go to a state of depression. This is a major reason why most of the young doctors, after completing their studies, will become agents of some multi- national marketing companies. The people who are the part of this marketing system will convince the young generation doctors that homoeopathic practice is not sufficient for a 'better' life. These types of movements are now common around us and some are attracted towards those effortless sources of income.
All these should be corrected by standardization in homoeopathic medical education, C H M E programs and homoeopathic practice. This is the time for us to think seriously whether we are doing justice to our system and to our master?. I H K is an organization of very efficient doctors following the principles of true homoeopathy. We all should work together to save this blessed system: 'THE GREAT HOMOEOPATHY".