New Publication
Homeopathy in Intensive Care
and Emergency Medicine
Homeopathy First Magazine
Best Vitamin C Drink 
Learn More With Caralyn 


Homeopathy World Community

Creating Waves of Awareness



CRITICISM and feedback is oxygen for a writer. Criticism whets his talents and the feedback opens up new vistas and broadens his horizon of knowledge. Good or bad, criticism must there be, or the writer feels that he has sung his song in a graveyard.

Right and to the point (I mean, context related, with right evaluation of the writer’s intent) criticism brightens the concept of the subject; and the uncouth and misplaced feedback and criticism mars and confuses the intent and drift of the subject. It is tantamount to nipping the ‘good’ in the bud. The would-be enlightening discussion is stifled at the very onset.

During the intellectual and subject related discussion the question of a superior or inferior person does not arise. The superior or inferior is not the person who takes part in the discussion, but the ‘point of view’ that he offers or adduces. It is the relevance and the cogency of the opinion put forward by a critic that is superior or valid.

Let me now talk concretely with examples. My blog on ‘Homeopathic Sociology or Socio-Therapeutics’, (published on Sept. 30, 2010), in which I applied the theory of “Chronic Miasms’ on the ills of society, and the curative measures suggested therein. A learned reader, without bothering about the subject matter and the real intent of the article, flashed a resume of the Chronic Miasms, as if he intended to educate or remind the writer about the pristine theory of Chronic Miasms. Or he perhaps thought that the writer had committed an unholy act, using a sacred piece of knowledge profanely in some other field than its wonted one. A person, who applies a nascent theory of one system of knowledge to an aspect of another system of knowledge, quite unrelated to it, must be conversant with the spirit of the theory and its true import and versatility. Otherwise, how could he apply a patent theory of one system of knowledge in the field of another system of knowledge, quite unrelated to it? But this kinky action of the critic created a prejudice about the intent of the article, and thus stifled the possible feedback at the very outset; or, as I’ve said above, ‘nipped the good in the bud’.

Similarly in response to my article: Constipation, Not a Disease, a critic from India, tried to teach the profession as to what constipation was and what remedies were related to that complaint, disregarding totally what my article was about. It was the second in my series of articles, under the title: Vision of a Physician, (few more articles may be added in future, in this series). This series of mine has a theme: ‘how not to prescribe’; and the motto of my ‘constipation’ article was: “Where foods can solve the problem, medicine should not be used”. Now, this sweet critic has detailed a long list of medicines, germane to this complaint. In all fairness, one feels that the scholarship the learned critic has shown was, in fact, not called for. Our articles are not for laymen, as they should not be, since the Homeopathy World Community is a forum of doctors and physicians. Therefore such a ‘cut-&-paste’ space filling was totally redundant. Homeopathic doctors are already conversant with these; or one can easily go to a repertory and find a long list of medicines under the rubric : ‘Constipation’, with so many sub-rubrics. If not, there are a lot of great books on homeopathic therapeutic; take, for example, Lilienthal’s Homeopathic Therapeutics; Dewey’s Practical Homeopathic Therapeutics, and Dr. Goodno’s classical magnum opus: The Practice of Medicine, in two big volumes, and many, many others.

In spite of what has been said above, one can easily appreciate and accept the leaned doctor’s detailed dissertation on constipation as labor of love; but it would have been better if he had tried to criticize the thematic article. He could have started the discussion, e.g., by saying that he had ‘cured’ many cases of constipation, by treating the constipation alone, without bothering, or instructing any change in the patient’s life-style; or something else to that effect.

We are equally erudite, equally ignorant and seekers of truth.


Usmani Resource Page

Copyright 2011/All rights reserved © Dr Usmani
Contact author for permission to use

Views: 94

Comment by Debby Bruck on January 7, 2011 at 12:42am

Dear Dr Usmani. I truly appreciate your contributions to HWC. I would like to respond. As I read through your article here, many thoughts came into my mind. First, was a correlation to the principle of disciplining or telling a child that his or her 'acts' were not good or right, rather than telling the child "You are not good." In regards to criticism, the best way to correct the problem by accepting the person, while not accepting the improper behavior.

Thinking about your very carefully worded and considered repost regarding how people respond flippantly or glibly with a quick 'this for that' tells me either they were not being considerate, taking any time to think about an educational answer or in most cases "not reading the article," and voila they pop in an answer. This common behavior happens on social networks and especially when people read news media headlines without thoroughly reading through the entire article to get the details.

I can tell you an example that happened this week on another network where I write. i.e. I wrote a blog and then posted a question in their feed forum with a link to the newly created blog. BAM! Immediately, someone posted a snide remark about spamming and flagged my post. My rating went down and I was not happy due to the numerous hours of intense work to write so many articles with care. That's when I posted another question, as shown below. Well, low and behold a few people commented, but they really didn't address the specific issue which I intimated. So be it. People simply don't read. Therefore, don't feel badly. Many are truly appreciating your contributions here. 

When you do a Hubpage boo-boo, do your emotions drop along with your ratings?

We know that the mysterious and secretive Hubpage algorithms involve all things "hubpages." This means your activity and related activity effects your profile score; and indirectly your individual Hub scores. When we accidentally do something not to the guidelines or liking of others [and perhaps get flagged] is there a way to make recompense? Can we DELETE our mistake on Hubpages QUESTION/ANSWERS section? Suddenly, profile rating drops and wonder how to repair the damage? Question is two part: 1. Do your emotions drop along with ratings? 2. Is there a way to repair profile score & feelings?


Comment by Kawsar Al Mamoon on January 13, 2011 at 2:52pm
Comment by Dr. Wequar Ali Khan on August 20, 2011 at 11:16am

Dr Usmani, you are one of the few from Pakistan whose articles are thought provoking; They are always with some message. I have always enjoyed reading them,and some time made comments also. There is always some thing to learn from your articles, even if one may not agree with the theme. 

So keep up the good work ;;   


You need to be a member of Homeopathy World Community to add comments!

Join Homeopathy World Community

Search This Site

GET ➤ 
Cancer and Homeopathy
Best Vitamin C Drink
for $3 coupon



© 2017   Created by Debby Bruck.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...