THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES

New Publication
Homeopathy in Intensive Care
and Emergency Medicine
Homeopathy First Magazine
Best Vitamin C Drink 
Learn More With Caralyn 
Coupon SHOPWITHHWC

 

Homeopathy World Community

Creating Waves of Awareness

What a foolish notion it is to feed that infant lime-water because he cannot digest lime! Is it not just as reasonable as anything else in allopathy? And  yet our homoeopaths use allopathic medicines. They use the lowest potencies they can get and it would seem strange if those substances cured any better in the hands of the homoeopath than in the hands of the allopath.

Now, it is astonishing that one single dose of the potency suitable to meet the state of disorder will make that infant commence to digest its food, and appropriate from its food the lime substance that it needs in its bones, and wherever else it needs it. All at once the teeth begin to grow; the bones begin to grow, and the legs get stiff enough for him to begin to walk, and they will hold him up. It is astonishing what changes will take place under the various medicines that are suitable for the disturbances of the hair, and the bones and nails. The remedy must be sufficiently potentized to correspond with the wrong. It certainly must not be crude because the crude material already stunts the child.

You will see within a month or six weeks after giving a solitary dose of the sufficiently potentized remedy the nails that were corrugated and uneven and spotted and irregular will form a margin and will grow out smooth. You will see the ugly little crowns upon the teeth, distorted, and black things as they come up out of the gums; but when they have been under the suitable homoeopathic remedy you will see them form a margin line, and from thereon the teeth look healthy, and from thereon the little body of the tooth is smooth and round; just as if that child had had an impulse to grow better teeth. That same thing probably takes place where the bones exist. The periosteum takes on healthy work. This is the Calcarea state when the patient needs lime and he cannot get it because he has been cloyed; or, because he has an indigestion, he is unable to assimilate the lime that is in his food, and it goes through him and does not affect him. So it is with much of the sickness we have, an inability to extract from the food and assimilate such things, as the body needs.

Would not anyone be a simpleton to suppose that he had been the cause of the building of a tooth? You do not build molehills out of our high potencies; they simply establish a state of order, so that digestion and assimilation go on, order is established and the tissues are improved. Health comes, beauty, a growth of hair, better skin, and better nails -

"Warnings and Advises of Dr. J T Kent in Homoeopathic Prescribing" by Dr. Satish Kumar Rana

 

Views: 1310

Comment by Dr.Sharad Shangloo on March 26, 2011 at 2:48am
It is a nice article and is a reminder to the homeopaths that we deal with the potencies not with the crude drug substance.
Comment by Dr. Satish Kumar Rana on March 26, 2011 at 2:59am
Yes! Dr. Shangloo,

People in our HWC also support taking and prescribing mother tinctures and other un-homoeopathic means. It is a discredit to their own knowledge as well as image. Who has learned to bring out similimum never pretends like this and do not depend upon mother tictures and formula drug combination. If these things had any place in homoeopathy Dr. Hahnemann must have, from day one, recommended these combinations etc.

Aphorism 16 is a strong support in favour of not using crude drugs.
Comment by Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed on March 27, 2011 at 4:58am

Dear dr Rana

While using combinations is unhomeopathic, mother tincture has been used by The great Hahnemann himself. Remember the case of washerwoman who was given the tincture of Bryonia to get cured by a single dose!

Comment by Dr Muhammed Rafeeque on March 28, 2011 at 12:35am

Sir, Combinations are definitely non homeopathic! But the mother tincture is definitely a homeopathic medicine. The case only decides the potency for each patient. During cholera epidemics, camphor mother tincture had saved many patients from death. Of course, when the potency increases, the depth of action of the remedy increases. When the susceptibility and reactive power of the patient is low, the potency also should be low. It is meaningless to use an arrow to put a small hole on a piece of paper - a small needle is enough. But, when an animal comes to attack us, the needle is useless - the arrow can work!

The intelligent physician knows when to use higher and lower potencies.

Comment by Dr. Satish Kumar Rana on March 28, 2011 at 2:49am
Dear Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed,
I need No.1 - a sure reference from the text to which you are referring, No.2 - If you people comment like this that Dr. Hahnemann himself used mother tinctures then what is the need of Aphorism No. 16? It is in the 6th edition. I believe you have been giving a reference prior to even 2nd and 3rd edition of Organon of Medicine.
Dr. Rafeeque,
I am not hesitant to say that I am not that intelligent but I am sure what I referred to the community is not false and fraud. For the knowledge and pursual of the HWC I reproduce Aphorism no. 16 hereunder. Let the intelligent minds decide what is wrong and what is right.
I am sure when remedy is correct it effects in all potencies but when it is not right it CAN NEVER effect even if it were given in mother tincture or potency.
Aphorism 16 reads as:
"§ 16 Fifth Edition
Our vital force, as a spirit-like dynamis, cannot be attacked and affected by injurious influences on the healthy organism caused by the external inimical forces that disturb the harmonious play of life, otherwise than in a spirit-like (dynamic) way, and in like manner, all such morbid derangements (diseases) cannot be removed from it by the physician in any other way than by the spirit-like (dynamic1, virtual) alterative powers of the serviceable medicines acting upon our spirit-like vital force, which perceives them through the medium of the sentient faculty of the nerves everywhere present in the organism, so that it is only by their dynamic action on the vital force that remedies are able to re-establish and do actually re-establish health and vital harmony, after the changes in the health of the patient cognizable by our senses (the totality of the symptoms) have revealed the disease to the carefully observing and investigating physician as fully as was requisite in order to enable him to cure it.
1 Most severe disease may be produced by sufficient disturbance of the vital force through the imagination and also cured by the same means.
§ 16 Sixth Edition
Our vital force, as a spirit-like dynamis, cannot be attacked and affected by injurious influences on the healthy organism caused by the external inimical forces that disturb the harmonious play of life, otherwise than in a spirit-like (dynamic) way, and in like manner, all such morbid derangements (diseases) cannot be removed from it by the physician in any other way than by the spirit-like (dynamic1, virtual) alterative powers of the serviceable medicines acting upon our spirit-like vital force, which perceives them through the medium of the sentient faculty of the nerves everywhere present in the organism, so that it is only by their dynamic action on the vital force that remedies are able to re-establish and do actually re-establish health and vital harmony, after the changes in the health of the patient cognizable by our senses (the totality of the symptoms) have revealed the disease to the carefully observing and investigating physician as fully as was requisite in order to enable him to cure it.
1 Most severe disease may be produced by sufficient disturbance of the vital force through the imagination and also cured by the same means." - Courtesy HPathy.

Last but most important: If we do not want to follow Hahnemann in toto, surely we are not practising homoeopathy. It can be safely named as mongrelism, as termed by Hahnemann himself.
Comment by Dr Muhammed Rafeeque on March 28, 2011 at 8:31am
Sir, Mongrelism is actually not related with potency selection. It was the name given for those homeopaths who pretend themself as homeopaths but practice mixopathy. Adjusting the potency as per the case is not mixopathy. Apart from the symptoms, the potency also should be similar to the case.
Comment by Dr. Satish Kumar Rana on March 28, 2011 at 10:06am

Yes! Doctor,

It was the name given for those homeopaths who pretend themself as homeopaths but practice MIXOPATHY, ALLOPATHY along with HOMOEOPATHY and ANTIPATHY. Now please do not ask what is antipathy. I hope you must know it.

 

Using mother tinctures is equal to using crude medicines and there is no difference between those using big doses of allopathy or ayurvedic mixtures and 'so-called' homoeopaths using big doses of mother tinctures singly or in mixture or in alternation.

 

I have given you the proof that only dynamic medicine can cure dynamic disease. Disease is also immaterial and the homoeopathic dose is also immaterial. So only potentized medicine will cure others will suppress for the time being or must bring about the prolonged side effects produced by the heavy doses.

 

If you all people supporting the use of mother tincture are right then Dr. Hahnemann WASTED his time unnecessary in bringing out potencies and he went up to Fifty Millesimal. He had seen these effects by giving low potencies hence he opted to triturition and dilution.

 

I should not say we are very selfish. We try to consume maximum quantity of drugs to earn more and more but we forget how selflessly Dr. Hahnemann devoted his precious years to develop homoeopathy step by step. We do not value it because we got it almost for NO SACRIFICE.

 

Please read Organon Aphorism 56 where Hanemann has also written about Contraria Contraris. I reproduce it hereunder:

"§ 56 Sixth Edition

By means of this palliative (antipathic, enantiopathic) method, introduced according to Galen’s teaching “Contraria contrariis” for seventeen centuries, the physicians hitherto could hope to win confidence while they deluded with almost instantaneous amelioration. But how fundamentally unhelpful and hurtful this method of treatment is (in diseases not running a rapid course) we shall see in what follows. It is certainly the only one of the modes of treatment adopted by the allopaths that had any manifest relation to a portion of the sufferings caused by the natural disease; but what kind of relation? Of a truth the very one (the exact contrary of the right one) that ought carefully to be avoided if we would not delude and make a mockery of the patient affected with a chronic disease1.

1 A third mode of employing medicines in diseases has been attempted to be created by means of Isopathy, as it is called - that is to say, a method of curing a given disease by the same contagious principle that produces it.  But even granting this could be done, yet, after all, seeing that the virus is given to the patient highly potentized, and consequently, in an altered condition, the cure is effected only by opposing a simillimum to a simillimum.

To attempt to cure by means of the very same morbific potency (per Idem) contradicts all normal human understanding and hence all experience. Those who first brought Isopathy to notice, probably thought of the benefit which mankind received from cowpox vaccination by which the vaccinated individual is protected against future cowpox infection and as it were cured in advance.  But both, cowpox and smallpox are only similar, in no way the same disease. In many respects they differ, namely in the more rapid course and mildness of cowpox and especially in this, that is never contagious to man by more nearness. Universal vaccination put an end to all epidemics of that deadly fearful smallpox to such an extent that the present generation does no longer possess a clear conception of the former frightful smallpox plague.

Moreover, in this way, undoubtedly, certain diseases peculiar to animals may give us remedies and thus happily enlarge our stock of homoeopathic remedies.

But to use a human morbific matter (a Psorin taken from the itch in man) as a remedy for the same itch or for evils arisen therefrom is - ?

Nothing can result from this but trouble and aggravation of the disease."

 

If still anybody supports the use of mother tinctures to cure diseases, I must recommend the later to go to a B-Class [not qualified as an institutional graduate] registered homoeopath who must be a better physician than a proud MD.

Comment by Dr Muhammed Rafeeque on March 29, 2011 at 12:39am

Dear doctor,

I do agree that mother tinctures can't cure the patient completely - dynamic medicine that can reach the miasmatic level is a must for the real cure. I do not use mother tinctures for all patients, but I definitely use them when I feel that the patient is about to say goodbye to me (in fact goodbye to homeopathy, because when one homeopath fails, usually patients prefer Allopathy). Again, I repeat, classical homeopathy is the right way, but for a person doing general practice (especially beginners) clinical tips, so called specifics, tinctures, may be necessary to manage a few types of cases.

Please consider the present situation of Homeopathy. Many experienced practitioners are practicing classical homeopathy successfully, but the young doctors are just imitating them blindly and fail to manage cases. We should also remember that the teachers depict ONLY the cured cases! A few "B class" practitioners do better homeopathy than us.

Hence, this is the time to study homeopathy from the grass roots level. Once we develop confidence, we can follow the classical way. Each and every day I get many acute failed cases from homeopaths. These patients are the victims of imitation of famous teachers! There are many foreign countries where homeopathy is not so famous, but the activities against homeopathy are more famous! The main reason is: Most of the homeopaths in those countries entertain only chronic cases, and do not consider acutes and severe cases. The only way to popularise homeopathy is by treating acutes and emergency cases. For that, we should follow the books by Beoricke, Clarke, Bishambar das, J N Singhal, etc.

Comment by Dr. Satish Kumar Rana on March 29, 2011 at 7:11am

Sorry Dr. Rafeeque,

 

I beg to differ.

 

If you agree that mother tinctures do not cure, then why you waste the time? Why are you confused and confusing others between 'real' and 'artificial' cure?

 

I though you are a matured homoeopath and HWC has appointed you an "Advisor." Do not you feel what will our next generation think if we quote such irresponsible remarks? If indicated drug in potency did nothing how can a crude perform unexpectedly well? Let the whole fraternity know the logic behind it. Let the whole community know that Hahnemann did wrong by inventing potentization.

 

These are just LAME excuses to start practice or to begin practice. Once a thief is always a theif. Can a mixopath with the passage of time ever become a unicist? NEVER! He can never gain the confidence of a unicist. He shall fall prone to the pharmaceutical industry and be the slave of these patents etc. This is not the right way of beginning practice of homoeopathy. A homoeopath administering many multiple prescription cane never gain confidence to which of the medicine has ameliorated. And is 100% doubtful about the curable action of the drugs.

 

I have considered the present condition of homoeopathy and blame it on persons supporting all rubbish things in the name of homoeopathy and are quite far away from the principles of homoeopathy. Homoeopathy is just on their sign-boards and in their degrees and nothing in the mind and practice. I am sure such supporters are drifting the ship of homoeopathy to a near perish.

 

Yes!there are not a few but many B-Class are better than qualified MDs who support antipathy and label themselves as homoeopaths. I learnt a lot from a B-Class about Hot and Chilly drugs when even there was no name like Dr. Vijayakar - my present mentor. you are wrong her - I know the teacher who explored his own follies and fallacies in front of us all and warned of them all.

 

Regarding the patient saying "Goodbye" - no one can stop it. Even the patients doing well leave the doctors without a solid reason.

 

I agree that this is the time to study homeopathy from the grass root level. What is this level? Grass root level is - study and apply the cardinal principles and do not cut the roots by spoiling the neophytes by saying that in the beginning of the practice use allopathy, mother tinctures and patents to carry on practice. this is mal-practice.

 

I have already mentioned that no one can gain confidence the way you think. A classical is classical from the beginning. I said a thief is thief for ever. Do not preach to become a thief first then a saint. How will a thief convert to a saint?

 

Dr. Rafeeque, you are again at the wrong track. Who says we are not capable of handling the acute cases with pure homoeopathy? I confidently can handle 90% of emergencies [excepting surgical] with single medicine without the help of any patent, allopathy or mother tincture.

 

Have you heard about the FLOW CHART OF ACUTES BY DR. VIJAYAKAR? It covers 90% of acute cases without fail. please think before you comment. in my practice of 32 years I have dealt with many acute cases without the help of any auxillaries.

Comment by Dr Muhammed Rafeeque on March 29, 2011 at 8:48am

OMG!!! Sir, I am not a myxopath as you mentioned. I give single medicine for most of my cases, but occasionally I prescribe tinctures for certain cases. So far, I have never prescribed patents and modern medical drugs. I feel I am much better than many saints, because they all started with Gentamicin, and an accidental cure took them back to homeopathy. On the other hand, immediately after completing my internship, I started my homeopathic practice. Of course, I used to give tinctures, biochemics and the indicated medicine together. But, I have never mixed several remedies in one bottle. But, now I have changed a lot. I hope one day I will be a saint, but for the time being let me present myself as a “thief”. I feel it is far better than behaving like a thief inside the clinic and pretending like a saint in front of the public. I write what I do, and there is no compulsion on the young doctors to blindly follow me. Even in my books and articles I have written this. The young doctors have the freedom to decide whether to follow the “saints” or the open minded “thieves”!!!!!

Anyway thanks for posting the latest version of Acute chart of Dr Vijaykar (Hope there is no copyright violation). I had used this chart a few years back. A few cases responded nicely, but there were many failures (May be due to wrong application of this method).

Comment

You need to be a member of Homeopathy World Community to add comments!

Join Homeopathy World Community

Search This Site

GET ➤ 
Cancer and Homeopathy
Best Vitamin C Drink
Enter SHOPWITHHWC
for $3 coupon

AGRO HOMEOPATHY

RADIO & VIDEO SHOWS

© 2019   Created by Debby Bruck.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...