New Publication
Homeopathy in Intensive Care
and Emergency Medicine
Homeopathy First Magazine
Best Vitamin C Drink 
Learn More With Caralyn 


Homeopathy World Community

Creating Waves of Awareness

"First they came for the homeopaths" - what's going on in the UK and how it will affect homeopathy everywhere

I've been working in the UK on the Parliamentary Evidence Check into homeopathy - and with a small group of other activists have been pushing back - we have achieved some traction - so I share this article written for hpathy here so that all homeopaths are aware of the back story to the anti-homeopathy campaign in the UK - which stands to affect homeopathy everywhere.  The report will be made public on 22nd Feb and we can expect it to be very critical - likely to call for withdrawal of funding for NHS homeopathy, increased restrictions on labelling and sale of over the counter remedies and so on. It's likely also that there will be concerns voiced about professional homeopaths and the possible danger posed by unregulated practitioners.  It's a well organised and orchestrated campaign that has been ramping up to this for many years now.  I've written a number of articles on this topic published in Similia - they are downloadable from this blog:

"First they came for the homeopaths" - published here:

And I paste it here for speed of access - all homeopaths need to understand this - perhaps we can use this forum to discuss options for action in other countries - a warning shot has already been fired in the US.

First they came for the hmeopaths by Carol Boyce

"For reasons that will probably never be clear, at a time when the nation faces so many challenges, the UK government’s parliamentary select Science and Technology committee decided to conduct an Evidence
Check into homeopathy at the end of 2009.

The homeopathic community scrambled to make written submissions before the deadline passed and waited for invitations to make oral submissions to the committee.  They never came.

The first Evidence Check meeting was held in two parts – the first group of witnesses made it plain where this evidence check was intended to go.  Tracy Brown, Managing Director of Sense About Science – the
lobby group responsible for a series of anti-homeopathy actions over
the years, including the 2006 sting of homeopaths for BBC NewsNight,
and the push for the WHO to ban homeopaths from working in the
developing world in August 2009.  Dr Ben Goldacre, journalist for The
Guardian and author of who saves his most vitriolic
anti-CAM rants for the homeopaths.  Professor Jayne Lawrence, Chief
Scientific Adviser, Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain,
enough said; Paul Bennett, Professional Standards Director of Boots the
high street chemist (who with his first words gave the media the
perfect sound bite when he said he had no evidence that homeopathy
works, but since consumers want it he felt they had a responsibility to
supply it.  He also said he had no evidence that homeopathy doesn’t
work, but that doesn’t make good headlines.)  And lone pro-homeopathy
witness, Mr Robert Wilson, Chairman of the British Association of
Homeopathic Manufacturers.

What was meant to be an investigation into what informs government policy about homeopathy devolved rapidly into something reminiscent of a courtroom brawl about whether homeopathy works or not, according to
the narrow world of Random Controlled Trials and meta-analyses.
Witnesses for the ‘prosecution’ were well prepared and at times it was
a tempting diversion to count how many times Dr Goldacre could fit
‘sugar pills’ into an answer.  Dr Evan Harris MP, one might say senior
counsel for the prosecution, excelled in the art of puerile questions
and distractions from the issue at hand.

You need to watch the meetings archived on the parliamentary website to fully appreciate how stacked the decks were.

Transcripts here:

Next up was Prof Edzard Ernst, nemesis of UK homeopathy and self-appointed expert; Dr Peter Fisher, Director of Research at the Royal London Homeopathic Hospital (and the only practicing homeopath);
Dr Robert Mathie, Research Development Adviser at the British
Homeopathic Association, and Dr James Thallon, the Medical Director at
NHS West Kent – the man personally responsible for withdrawal of
funding and the consequent closure of the Tunbridge Wells Homeopathic
Hospital last year.

Dr Harris feeling on safe ground took great delight in letting rip.  His line of questioning to Dr Fisher included such questions as: “Why do you think that there has been no Nobel Prize given to the people who
have made these astonishing discoveries of the potential for the memory
of water…..?”

And: “On that basis then, why is it that when you have a solution of water that used to have some homeopathic substance in it but it has been diluted, that the water is said to retain that memory but does not
remember all the poo, you could call it, that has been in it….”

My own MP Ian Stewart, also on the committee, made a vain attempt to bring some dignity to the proceedings, but he was only one man.

The second Evidence Check committee meeting on Nov 30th called witnesses Mr Mike O’Brien MP, Government Minister for Health Services; Professor Kent Woods, Chief Executive, Medicines and
Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, and Professor David Harper Chief
Scientist, Department of Health.

At the start of the meeting, the Chair of the Science and Technology committee was at pains to put on record that:

“…… there seems to be a little confusion about the nature of the work that we are doing, this is not an inquiry into whether homeopathy works or not. This is an inquiry which follows a series of evidence
checks across a number of government departments to see whether in fact
there was any evidence to support the Government’s policy towards
homeopathy. I want to make that absolutely clear.”

And then he proceeded: “I wonder if we can therefore start with you, Minister. Does the Government have any credible evidence that homeopathy works beyond the placebo effect?”

Mike O’Brien started to talk about the 2008 Department of Health’s Northern Ireland CAM project, which had proved so successful, but then inexplicably said that the project had not included homeopathy!!  Of
course it included homeopathy and the patients and the GPs who referred
their ‘heart sink’ patients to the homeopaths, were very satisfied with
the results.

And so it went on…probably one of the most frustrating pieces of theatre I have ever had cause to watch.

The last Saturday in January brought us the so-called1023 publicity stunt when small groups of denialists, skeptics, and their siblings and supporters did ‘their bit for science’ and took part in a national
‘mass overdose’ of homeopathic medicines, thereby proving yet again
that these people know nothing at all about homeopathy.

The London event saw Dr Evan Harris of the Science and Technology parliamentary select committee wearing the T-Shirt, amusing the crowd of overdosers with an account of his questioning of Dr Fisher and
taking part in the overdose.  To say he was in breach of the General
Medical Council Guidelines for Good Practice, Sections 1.46 and 1.47
Respect for Colleagues might be described as an understatement.  To say
he made a public display of a bias so extreme that it ought to
disqualify him from the Evidence Check is in no doubt.

You can watch him here:

The Evidence Check report with its recommendations regarding NHS homeopathy will be made public on Feb 22nd.  We can expect it to be very critical, and I predict calls for withdrawal of funding for NHS homeopathy; tightening of regulations of
manufacturing and labeling of homeopathic medicines; limits to sales of
over the counter homeopathic medicines, and further down the road,
increasing restrictions for professional homeopaths.

Since the Evidence Check was supposed to be about what informs government policy, the focus SHOULD have been the reports from the homeopathic hospitals submitted to the committee about the
effectiveness, cost effectiveness and patient satisfaction of
homeopathy in the real world – yet this was never discussed at all –
and the government’s own successful pilot study in Northern Ireland,
which was not discussed because the Minster of Health mistakenly said
it had not included homeopathy!

Those in the UK who have been following the campaign to remove access to homeopathy within the NHS, are clear about several points – and homeopaths worldwide would do well to pay attention to the UK

This Evidence Check was part of that orchestrated campaign.  Powerful lobby groups like Sense About Science, funded by the pharmaceutical industry, and related organizations spikedonline and The
Institute for Ideas, feed misinformation to sympathetic journalists in
major mainstream media outlets, which in turn allow no rebuttals of the
misinformation that they publish.  Armies of bloggers use the internet
and twitter to spread the misinformation far and wide. Individual
practitioners are isolated and personally attacked on webpages,
credentials called into question, threats made.

We need to ask why these groups would invest so much time, effort and resources to get rid of NHS homeopathy, which comprises just 0.004% of the total NHS budget?  If they were concerned, as they claim, about
patient welfare, surely it would be more productive if they looked into
ghost writers in medical journals skewing the facts; dangerous pharma
drugs brought to market despite evidence of harm; pharma influence of
doctors, medical schools, university departments, and etc. etc. etc. 
But they don’t because their job is to spin the corporate line.

Homeopathy is the easy target of the CAM world – but we need to think of it as “first they came for the homeopaths”.  Codex in the European Union is already moving manufacture of supplements into the
hands of the pharmaceutical industry, and pushing for prescription-only
delivery, by a medical profession that knows almost nothing about the

Homeopaths and their professional organizations need to get politically savvy, it’s a powerful agenda that’s being served. CAM groups should collaborate urgently and throw all their weight behind
defending homeopathy, because what’s happening in the homeopathic world
is only the thin end of the wedge that’s being hammered into place.

For more on the Evidence Check and the UK situation check out:


Views: 365

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Just to be clear - I was not in any way suggesting that we change what we do - we MUST treat individually - and part of our work is educating patients - but we must also be able to speak the language of the system they have been raised within - allopathy - we can talk about the allopathic diagnosis AND educate patients to understand how dis-ease occurs and how it is cured.
What we must not do is dilute our method in order to be accepted by main stream medicine - or all is lost!
That is good. We are getting clear as we go along.
First, we must have our own research methodology and objectives.
Two, for sake of being accepted.. we must not deviate from cardinal principle of individualzing.
Yes, it is a good skill to communicate in a way that reassures the patient.. in line with his belief system..
Yet, we remain vulnerable to be discounted as just placebo..
They are, in fact, playing to the gallery.
Hi Manoj,
We must focus on our work and getting solid research done in which we can control the methodology so it can really measure homeopathic action - and we must remember at all times that these assertions of placebo and the meyhem that is happening in the UK right now is not about what works or not - it is pure politics and vested interests - so having a rational debate is not possible with these people - we must save our energy for those people who are willing to listen - and in the UK we are lobbying the rest of parliament and putting a new motion forward to parliament. It's so much work and it distracts from what is important - healing the suffering humanity!
Hi Carol,

I totally agree with you that they are not looking to find truth. It is political, vested interest.

We must focus on rational approaches that will reach out to those who are willing to listen and might be fence sitters. But how we will identify those who are receptive to our message? Our own collegues and patients? Can we make them do something that they are not doing right now? Something that is over and above there present relation with homeopathy? One is of course this signature campaign. What else?
Who else?

Again, you are right in emphasizing the need of research that measure homeopathic action that is over and above placebo/allopathic intervention!
In acute cases it is pretty simple to demonstrate the shorter recovery time with homeopathy.. fever, pains and aches, appetite, coryza..but the problem is to find big enough cohort to experiment and ethical question of using placebos as control.

Homeopathic.. dynamic action is not entirely predictable.. organism.. vital force.. is more like non-linear right brain... and choses and realigns cellular function in the total context of the organism... not a designer baby like.. material doses.. that create statistically predictable action at a particular tissue level... so.. can we take total quality of life index over a significant period of time (that takes care of agg phase etc) in the chronic cases... as the measure of homeopathic action?
eg.. we can take children on homeopathy and show lesser sick absentism... fewer asthmatic episodes... lesser incidence of obesity..
well, i am just thinking aloud.. so that even incoherent ideas may work as launching pad and stimulate creative juices of others in the group.

I can sense the pain when you talk about distraction from more important healing work. You are not alone UK. This is call of the planet. We are all together in this vital struggle.

Here's an idea for spreading homeopathy: free homeopathy for children. A new charity is starting with the aim of creating a generation that truly knows through experience what homeopathy can do, and of course their families. Just think what this will do for us not just long term, but even within 5 years. Children grow so fast, this could make such a difference... Moreover, in the UK at least, children and pregnant women are some of the main users of homeopathy, as especially at this stage of life, people don't feel safe with allopathy, so there is a big need for this. On top of this, children tend to respond well to homeopathy as their vital force is still strong and relatively untampered with, and case taking can often be more straightforward than adults since not such a long life history is needed. For so many reasons, this idea makes sense to me...
great idea.homoeopathy grows with medical camps.
Homeopathy,s enemies are not the UK govt. actually they are the gigantic allopathic medicine manufacturers who dominant all over the world who are very powerful and influencing on every government, and every body knows that where s they belong from. homeopathic is the only affordable way or system of treatment which can wipe out the dominance of these giant robbers of society.
Yes indeed and sadly now there are corporations richer than entire countries and they can set the agenda. Governments, media, everything that affects our lives - including the air we breathe and the water we drink. Right now we are talking about homeopathy but our situation is only a good illustration of a much bigger issue. The entire planet needs to work together on this.
All the more reasons that we act responsibly and strategically, Carol.
Putting blame to allopathic pharmacies is not fair. On that topic, I have written two pages earlier. Might be you will find a link in search.


HWC Partners


© 2019   Created by Debby Bruck.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...